An Analysis of Mood and Modality in Emma Watson’s Speech at theHeForShe Campaign

Main Article Content

Ika Novia Puspita
Hanna Sundari
Tita Puspitasari

Abstract

This study analyzes the text of the speech Emma Watson gave
during the launch of the ”HeForShe” campaign in New York, the
United States. Based on Halliday's systemic functional linguistics
approach and discourse analysis, this study. The researcher mainly
analyzes Emma Watson's speech, which focused on several mood
and modality types. From the mood structure analysis of
interpersonal meaning, there are 72 subjects and 71 finites. While
for residue elements, there are 66 predicators, 65 complements and
39 adjuncts consisting of 34 conjunctive adjuncts, 8 circumstantial
adjuncts, and 2 mood adjuncts. The researcher discovered there are
90 declarative moods and 5 interrogative moods. Declarative is the
mood type that dominates in the speech. The result of modality is
about 44 modals in total. The modality types consist of 10 modals
of low degree, 28 modals of medium/middle degree, and 6 modals
of high degree. Watson tends to use a declarative mood that aims to
provide information about something to the audience, about gender
equality and how men should also be involved in the campaign. The
researcher found that the dominant type of modality is middle
degree modality. This means that the speaker delivers her speech
with moderate politeness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

An Analysis of Mood and Modality in Emma Watson’s Speech at theHeForShe Campaign. (2025). Language, Innovation, Humanism, and Educational Technology, 1(1), 1-8. https://instructionaljournal.com/light/article/view/1

References

Aisyah, S. N. (2017) Studi Rencana Pengembangan Sekolah di SMK 45 Lembang. Universitas Pendidikan

Indonesia. Bandung.

Carter, R. (2011). English Grammar Today with CD-ROM: An AZ of Spoken and Written Grammar.

Cambridge University Press.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Feng, H., & Liu, Y. (2010). Analysis of Interpersonal Meaning in Public Speeches--A Case Study of

Obama's Speech. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 1(6).

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Cammeray, NSW: Antipodean

Educational Enterprises.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Spoken and written modes of meaning. Media texts: Authors and readers, 7, 51-

73.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar 3rd Ed. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. USA: Routledge.

Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Mosal..

Rabiah, S. (2018). Language as a tool for communication and cultural reality discloser. The 1st

International Conference on Media, Communication, and Culture, Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

University, Indonesia.

Vasquez, J. (2018). Mood and Modality: Available Choices within the Interpersonal Marofunction of

Language. In Nelta Elt Forum.

Webster, J. J. (2019). Key Terms in the SFL Model. In G. Thompson, W. L. Bowcher, & L. Fontaine (Eds.),

The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 35–54; By D. Schönthal).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.004

Yendra, S. S. (2016). Mengenal Ilmu Bahasa (Linguistik). Deepublish.